concepts/sandboxing.md +86 −20
11# Sandboxing – Codex# Sandbox
2 2
33Sandboxing is the boundary that lets Codex act autonomously without giving itThe sandbox is the boundary that lets Codex act autonomously without giving it
4unrestricted access to your machine. When Codex runs local commands in the4unrestricted access to your machine. When Codex runs local commands in the
5**Codex app**, **IDE extension**, or **CLI**, those commands run inside a5**Codex app**, **IDE extension**, or **CLI**, those commands run inside a
6constrained environment instead of running with full access by default.6constrained environment instead of running with full access by default.
21those commands inherit the same sandbox boundaries.21those commands inherit the same sandbox boundaries.
22 22
23Codex uses platform-native enforcement on each OS. The implementation differs23Codex uses platform-native enforcement on each OS. The implementation differs
2424between macOS, Linux, WSL, and native Windows, but the idea is the same acrossbetween macOS, Linux, WSL2, and native Windows, but the idea is the same across
25surfaces: give the agent a bounded place to work so routine tasks can run25surfaces: give the agent a bounded place to work so routine tasks can run
26autonomously inside clear limits.26autonomously inside clear limits.
27 27
28## Why it matters28## Why it matters
29 29
3030Sandboxing reduces approval fatigue. Instead of asking you to confirm everyThe sandbox reduces approval fatigue. Instead of asking you to confirm every
31low-risk command, Codex can read files, make edits, and run routine project31low-risk command, Codex can read files, make edits, and run routine project
32commands within the boundary you already approved.32commands within the boundary you already approved.
33 33
3434It also gives you a clearer trust model for agentic work. You are not justIt also gives you a clearer trust model for agentic work. You aren't just
35trusting the agent's intentions; you are trusting that the agent is operating35trusting the agent's intentions; you are trusting that the agent is operating
36inside enforced limits. That makes it easier to let Codex work independently36inside enforced limits. That makes it easier to let Codex work independently
37while still knowing when it will stop and ask for help.37while still knowing when it will stop and ask for help.
52 52
53On **Linux and WSL2**, install `bubblewrap` with your package manager first:53On **Linux and WSL2**, install `bubblewrap` with your package manager first:
54 54
55<Tabs
56 id="codex-sandboxing-prerequisites"
57 param="sandbox-os"
58 tabs={[
59 { id: "ubuntu-debian", label: "Ubuntu/Debian" },
60 { id: "fedora", label: "Fedora" },
61 ]}
62>
63 <div slot="ubuntu-debian">
64
55```bash65```bash
56sudo apt install bubblewrap66sudo apt install bubblewrap
57```67```
58 68
69 </div>
70
71 <div slot="fedora">
72
59```bash73```bash
60sudo dnf install bubblewrap74sudo dnf install bubblewrap
61```75```
62 76
6377Codex uses the system `bwrap` at `/usr/bin/bwrap` when it is available. If it </div>
6478is missing, Codex falls back to a bundled helper, but that helper requires</Tabs>
6579unprivileged user namespaces. Installing your distro’s `bubblewrap` package is
6680the most reliable setup.Codex uses the first `bwrap` executable it finds on `PATH`. If no `bwrap`
81executable is available, Codex falls back to a bundled helper, but that helper
82requires support for unprivileged user namespace creation. Installing the
83distribution package that provides `bwrap` keeps this setup reliable.
84
85Codex surfaces a startup warning when `bwrap` is missing or when the helper
86can't create the needed user namespace. On distributions that restrict this
87AppArmor setting, prefer loading the `bwrap` AppArmor profile so `bwrap` can
88keep working without disabling the restriction globally.
89
90**Ubuntu AppArmor note:** On Ubuntu 25.04, installing `bubblewrap` from
91 Ubuntu's package repository should work without extra AppArmor setup. The
92 `bwrap-userns-restrict` profile ships in the `apparmor` package at
93 `/etc/apparmor.d/bwrap-userns-restrict`.
94
95On Ubuntu 24.04, Codex may still warn that it can't create the needed user
96namespace after `bubblewrap` is installed. Copy and load the extra profile:
97
98```bash
99sudo apt update
100sudo apt install apparmor-profiles apparmor-utils
101sudo install -m 0644 \
102 /usr/share/apparmor/extra-profiles/bwrap-userns-restrict \
103 /etc/apparmor.d/bwrap-userns-restrict
104sudo apparmor_parser -r /etc/apparmor.d/bwrap-userns-restrict
105```
106
107`apparmor_parser -r` loads the profile into the kernel without a reboot. You
108can also reload all AppArmor profiles:
109
110```bash
111sudo systemctl reload apparmor.service
112```
67 113
68114Codex surfaces a startup warning when `bwrap` is missing or cannot create userIf that profile is unavailable or does not resolve the issue, you can disable
69115namespaces. On distributions that restrict them with AppArmor, you can enablethe AppArmor unprivileged user namespace restriction with:
70them with:
71 116
72```bash117```bash
73sudo sysctl -w kernel.apparmor_restrict_unprivileged_userns=0118sudo sysctl -w kernel.apparmor_restrict_unprivileged_userns=0
81the composer or chat input. That selector lets you rely on Codex's default126the composer or chat input. That selector lets you rely on Codex's default
82permissions, switch to full access, or use your custom configuration.127permissions, switch to full access, or use your custom configuration.
83 128
84129<div class="not-prose max-w-[22rem] mr-auto mb-6">
130 <img src="https://developers.openai.com/images/codex/app/permissions-selector-light.webp"
131 alt="Codex app permissions selector showing Default permissions, Full access, and Custom (config.toml)"
132 class="block h-auto w-full mx-0!"
133 />
134</div>
85 135
86In the CLI, use [`/permissions`](https://developers.openai.com/codex/cli/slash-commands#update-permissions-with-permissions)136In the CLI, use [`/permissions`](https://developers.openai.com/codex/cli/slash-commands#update-permissions-with-permissions)
87to switch modes during a session.137to switch modes during a session.
99 149
100At a high level, the common sandbox modes are:150At a high level, the common sandbox modes are:
101 151
102152- `read-only`: Codex can inspect files, but it cannot edit files or run- `read-only`: Codex can inspect files, but it can't edit files or run
103 commands without approval.153 commands without approval.
104- `workspace-write`: Codex can read files, edit within the workspace, and run154- `workspace-write`: Codex can read files, edit within the workspace, and run
105 routine local commands inside that boundary. This is the default low-friction155 routine local commands inside that boundary. This is the default low-friction
110 160
111The common approval policies are:161The common approval policies are:
112 162
113163- `untrusted`: Codex asks before running commands that are not in its trusted- `untrusted`: Codex asks before running commands that aren't in its trusted
114 set.164 set.
115- `on-request`: Codex works inside the sandbox by default and asks when it165- `on-request`: Codex works inside the sandbox by default and asks when it
116 needs to go beyond that boundary.166 needs to go beyond that boundary.
117167- `never`: Codex does not stop for approval prompts.- `never`: Codex doesn't stop for approval prompts.
118 168
119Full access means using `sandbox_mode = "danger-full-access"` together with169Full access means using `sandbox_mode = "danger-full-access"` together with
120170`approval_policy = "never"`. By contrast, `--full-auto` is the lower-risk local`approval_policy = "never"`. By contrast, the lower-risk local automation
121171automation preset: `sandbox_mode = "workspace-write"` andpreset is `sandbox_mode = "workspace-write"` together with
122172`approval_policy = "on-request"`.`approval_policy = "on-request"`, or the matching CLI flags
173`--sandbox workspace-write --ask-for-approval on-request`.
123 174
124If you need Codex to work across more than one directory, writable roots let175If you need Codex to work across more than one directory, writable roots let
125you extend the places it can modify without removing the sandbox entirely. If176you extend the places it can modify without removing the sandbox entirely. If
126you need a broader or narrower trust boundary, adjust the default sandbox mode177you need a broader or narrower trust boundary, adjust the default sandbox mode
127178and approval policy instead of relying on ad hoc exceptions.and approval policy instead of relying on one-off exceptions.
179
180For reusable permission sets, set `default_permissions` to a named profile and
181define `[permissions.<name>.filesystem]` or `[permissions.<name>.network]`.
182Managed network profiles use map tables such as
183`[permissions.<name>.network.domains]` and
184`[permissions.<name>.network.unix_sockets]` for domain and socket rules.
185Filesystem profiles can also deny reads for exact paths or glob patterns by
186setting matching entries to `"none"`; use this to keep files such as local
187secrets unreadable without turning off workspace writes.
128 188
129When a workflow needs a specific exception, use [rules](https://developers.openai.com/codex/rules). Rules189When a workflow needs a specific exception, use [rules](https://developers.openai.com/codex/rules). Rules
130let you allow, prompt, or forbid command prefixes outside the sandbox, which is190let you allow, prompt, or forbid command prefixes outside the sandbox, which is
133[Codex app features](https://developers.openai.com/codex/app/features#approvals-and-sandboxing), and for the193[Codex app features](https://developers.openai.com/codex/app/features#approvals-and-sandboxing), and for the
134IDE-specific settings entry points, see [Codex IDE extension settings](https://developers.openai.com/codex/ide/settings).194IDE-specific settings entry points, see [Codex IDE extension settings](https://developers.openai.com/codex/ide/settings).
135 195
196Automatic review, when available, doesn't change the sandbox boundary. It
197reviews approval requests, such as sandbox escalations or network access, while
198actions already allowed inside the sandbox run without extra review. See
199[Automatic approval reviews](https://developers.openai.com/codex/agent-approvals-security#automatic-approval-reviews)
200for the policy behavior.
201
136Platform details live in the platform-specific docs. For native Windows setup,202Platform details live in the platform-specific docs. For native Windows setup,
137behavior, and troubleshooting, see [Windows](https://developers.openai.com/codex/windows). For admin203behavior, and troubleshooting, see [Windows](https://developers.openai.com/codex/windows). For admin
138requirements and organization-level constraints on sandboxing and approvals, see204requirements and organization-level constraints on sandboxing and approvals, see